26 Apr (Revision of ASME STS-1–). Steel Stacks. AN AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD. Three Park Avenue • New York, NY • USA. In addition, the materials of construction referenced in this Standard may not be allowed for use with flammable gases under pressure per ASME B and. ASME procedures provide for reconsideration of this interpretation when or if additional REC# STS (81KB) · STS Section ( 9KB).

Author: Kazradal Mulabar
Country: Sao Tome and Principe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 8 June 2004
Pages: 90
PDF File Size: 20.30 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.75 Mb
ISBN: 554-5-38187-723-4
Downloads: 59788
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: JoJojar

Xts Now Over the past three decades, 3D printing has developed a reputation as an essential manufacturing process for prototype parts. If this was the case i would think there would be thorough documentation on the subject. D and t are intimately related in this type of buckling problem.

Found this in Gaylord and Gaylord, edition. My company desings and has designed steel stacks by the tss 4 cases for years. Artificial intelligence AI has recently become a field in which research is proceeding at a feverish pace. The biggest curve ball, to me, was no mention or relation to asme sts 1 2006 in asme sts 1 2006 Does this make sense?

Consistent improvement in parts and systems are a standard asme sts 1 2006 of the job. My first look would be a number of Timoshenko books or Roark. In most buckling problems, you are always looking for a min. I think you are correct about contacting ASME about this, but im still hoping im missing something obvious here.

The issue is in design of something like a 1. This is tellig me that my allow is. We should maybe looking at another form of buckling for these kinds of cylindrical structures, and that is that they can go into a flatter, asme sts 1 2006 oval, shape.


Your back-asswards thoughts are exactly what the senior structural guys i talked to thought, but reversing the signs would make less sense as it would be setting a required minimum thickness of mm Again, does this thought and design process, when eq is not satisfied, coincide with the intended design of the ASME? It is a prerequisite to use the cases for allowable stress design per the asme STS1. I’m not so sure that I would be asme sts 1 2006 bold as to say you have a compact section.

What do the power transmission people do with their towers? asme sts 1 2006

Committee Pages – STS Steel Stacks

Ill write a little more later as it has been a hectic daybut perhaps these findings may spark some of your previous asme sts 1 2006 on the subject. Notice the 11 and similarities to the ASME. And can anyone provide a reason that the ASME would be limiting maximum plate thickness by diameter. My head is spinning.

asme sts 1 2006 What do you do when equation is not satisfied? When using the above method, I am able to calculate the exact thicknesses being used by my international colleagues. As you go to thinner plate, the allowable stress equations will start needing to consider local buckling.

In your 4th para. Solving for Sbl in the asme allowable combined long. I wasn’t saying you made a typo. I always thought, without either of us saying it, that you would be checking this as a slender canti.


This also apears to not be the case as FY is on asme sts 1 2006 right side of the formula stronger steel would allow larger thicknesses Join your peers on the Internet’s largest technical engineering professional community. With a little more digging and work, you and I could teach a seminar or semester course in asms stack design.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. It certainly isn’t a rolling issue in the 1.

So, it shouldn’t be hard to wrap your head around this, but it’s a min. They undoubtedly do pay some attention to pl. And here is where the aame asme sts 1 2006 Loads, height, wind, eq, ice, etc all come into play We have the cases automated with excel and STAAD and I can see that the thickness provided by my European colleagues of mm are required at the base for this stack asme sts 1 2006 pass design.

A more interesting question now may be to read some of the literature on vibration and dynamics of stacks.

Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework. Must go, but perhaps this will spark your thoughts.

I actually found some older books on buckling that may point me in the right direction near the end of the day today. The extremes of your buckling problem are: