An extraordinary history of humanity’s changing vision of the universe. In this masterly synthesis, Arthur Koestler cuts through the sterile distinction between. ovelist, essayist and political man of action, Arthur Koestler emerges in this book as a historian of the sciences. He traces, with a comic writer’s eye and a. The Sleepwalkers. A history of man’s changing vision of the Universe. ARTHUR KOESTLER. With an Introduction by. HERBERT BUTTERFIELD, M.A.. Master of.
|Published (Last):||18 May 2016|
|PDF File Size:||13.5 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.79 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Below, a few paragraphs that have caught my attention: Aug 23, A.
Sep 01, Frank Z. Maybe The sleepwalkers arthur koestler just didn’t get it. He also provides vivid and judicious pen-portraits of a string of great scientists and makes clear the role that political bias and unconscious prejudice played in their creativity. In order to make revolutionary discoveries, one must peal back the layers of accepted thought and question dogma. Sep 19, Michael Cayley rated it it was amazing Shelves: But Kepler felt he could do better, junked the solution, and spent several the sleepwalkers arthur koestler years messing with the data until he derived his First and Second Laws.
He said that, at the present time, man could decide that the universe could simply not be comprehended with the human mind. Art lost its koestlef, science its mystical inspiration; man became again deaf to the harmony of the spheres.
Sprinkled amongst Kepler’s great discoveries were fanciful and incorrect astronomical theories. In Great on Kepler and the Galileo eleepwalkers, far too light on ancients and Newton. Copernicus was an intellectual coward.
Arthur Koestler – The Sleepwalkers – A History of Man’s Changing Vision of the Universe
Arthur Koestler has – or rather, had – a way with words. Apr 16, Stephan Frank rated it it was amazing. An interesting book for amateurs of Space Operas SF as well, obviously. Thoroughly researched, incredibly well written, and Koestler’s insights into these men’s lives seems uncannily spot on. Also, Koestler downplays the Newtonian synthesis This task kept them busy for the next two thousand years.
After nearly dense pages on the various non-entities surrounding Copernicus, a man who seems to have spent most of his life avoiding real work and contributed nothing really new by the way of astronomy or scientific thought, one wonders what exactly motivated Koestler to write this book. A series of well researched essays on Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo, and how they stumbled, or in Koestler’s words – sleepwalked, their way through their eponymous works and discoveries.
koewtler During the last few centuries, from about A. All of which is to say that over the years I have become a good deal more critical about the first book on the history of science that I ever encountered and devoured than when I first read it in the best-selling Penguin edition of I take issue with some of the sources Koestler used here, most of which are secondary sources.
The sleepwalkers arthur koestler, then, who can see slleepwalkers stars anymore? This page was last edited on 22 Decemberat And if, arthurr Koestler asserts, the writing and insertion of an unauthorized preface to koestldr book by the printer Osiander of Nuremburg constitutes “the greatest scandal in the history of science,” then Dan Quayle may be listed among the most effective American statesmen in US history.
Apparently there are at least 4 places in the Bible where God pretty clearly states that the Earth doesn’t move – Ecclesiastes 1: Koestler also doesn’t seem to consider the possibility that Galileo potentially had a lot to gain in attacking Kepler directly during the s to clear Copernican theory from its association with Lutheranism the sleepwalkers arthur koestler heretical Lutheranism at that but in fact treated him relatively, and uncharacteristically, gently even in the Dialogue on the The sleepwalkers arthur koestler Chief World Systems.
The third and final subtopic of the book is concerned with the psychological aspects of the contributors to the history of cosmology. In addition to this, in the first half Koestler traced the sleepwalkers arthur koestler views of the universe from the ancient world, the middle ages through the Ionian school up until the age of Newton.
The contrast was not against the traditional Ptolemaic system everything goes round the The sleepwalkers arthur koestlerbut against the much more sophisticated system proposed sleepwal,ers Tycho Sleepealkers the Sun and the Moon go round the Earth, all the other planets go round the Sun.
But also how Galileo saw himself as THE chosen one with regards to the cosmos, how he claimed to have found the solution to problem x or y, while it were other researches who had done all the work, which Galileo never thought of examining and continued stubbornly his own work.
The Sleepwalkers: A History of Man’s Changing Vision of the Universe by Arthur Koestler
These thoughts held astronomy, and perhaps all science, back for years. Yet the decisions coming out of free will can be heavily influenced by larger tge Feb 07, Szplug rated it really liked the sleepwalkers arthur koestler. A second subtopic of the book is the division, which is now complete, of science and religion.