23 Sep Overview. The Government of India (GoI) passed the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) in September , which was. 31 May The audit report observed large variations in some states between planned . Development, MGNREGA, Report to the People, February 23 Apr The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has found a number of flaws in Guidelines: MGNREGA operational guidelines
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||10 April 2005|
|PDF File Size:||18.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Further, inGOI released Rs.
See table 2 for more details. Record Keeping and Monitoring The audit found poor record maintenance at not just the GP level but also at the block and district levels. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive.
A 20133 number of works amounting to Rs. The per rural household employment has declined from 54 days in to 43 days inthe CAG audit report says.
The audit report observed large variations in some states between planned employment generations as per the labour budget and actual employment generated.
Historically, Bihar has been a major centre for learning and education. In April that rwport, the Government of Bihar had announced the launch of an ambitious, innovative scheme called We have sent you a verification email.
CAG talks about misappropriation of funds in MGNREGA scheme – The Hindu
Some of the findings of the CAG are highlighted below: The report further sampled 38, beneficiaries across 27 states to assess their perception, awareness and experiences with the scheme. In fact, in 25 sampled districts, across 9 states — 4, works amounting to Rs. The audit is available online at: All Comments Your Activity.
Finally, the audit report also analysed the correlation between rural poverty and the average number of households provided employment during geport The audit finds that works amounting to around Rs 4, crore were incomplete even after one to five years of launching. Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. The audit report also observes that BiharMaharashtra and Uttar Pradesh which constituted 46 per cent of the rural poor utilised only 20 per cent of the total nreag released under the Scheme.
Beneficiary Analysis Finally, the audit report also analysed the correlation between rural poverty and the average number of households provided employment during till As with other schemes the last few years has eeport an increasing gap between allocations made for MGNREGA and the actual release of funds.
Further, excess funds of Rs. Shortfall between actual employment generated and projections in the labour budget S. Further, funds for training personnel were highly underutilised in many states. These GRS are responsible for maintaining all documents, overseeing the process of registration, distribution of job cards, allocation of works, payment of wages nreta ensuring monitoring of the scheme through social audits.
Highlights from the CAG Performance Audit of MGNREGA | Accountability Initiative
People burst crackers in Coimbatore, disobeying government timeslots While at an aggregate level, the report found that there appears to be a correlation between poverty and employment given under MGNREGS, there were some notable exceptions. To verify, just follow the link in the message.
Delays were highest at the GP level —difference between the target date of submission to the block and actual submission ranged from 1 month to as high as 21 months! Let’s work together to keep the conversation civil. reporh
CAG talks about misappropriation of funds in MGNREGA scheme
Read Post a comment. Moreover, 1,02, inadmissible works amounting to Rs.
See table 2 for more details Table 2: Table 5 of the report Moreover, in 14 states and 1 UT There has been also a substantial decline in the proportion of works completed inaccording to the report.